Showing posts with label They Think It's Smart. Show all posts
Showing posts with label They Think It's Smart. Show all posts

Monday, December 24, 2007

When you read, you also need to understand!


What do you think these guys from Kelab Maya UMNO wish to do to Hesitant Writings? This angry post was found on their site.
All I can say is, it's apparent the 1st guy didn't understand what I was saying, and the guy 007, who sounded like the big scary hero, understood less.

The guy 007 wrote :
Who the hell is the owner of that blog? Must everyone answer to every blog? Must everyone layan Malaysiakini? Why???
...
Sigh. Such anger. Chill man. And, do try t0 understand what was written initially. Then again, that may be too much for you guys!
....
to the rest :
Click on the photo for a better view, or, have fun, go on to :

Saturday, December 22, 2007

Watch those State Anthems!

From Malaysiakini's report :

Johari Ibrahim says : “Only Muslims can use ‘Allah’. It’s a Muslim word, you see. It’s from (the Arabic (language). We cannot let other religions use it because it will confuse people,” he said when contacted today.

excerpts from :
Johore state anthem : "Allah peliharakan Sultan.."
Selangor state anthem : "Allah lanjutkan usia Tuanku.."

and I can go on pasting lyrics from anthems of the remainder states with Sultans.

I am sure the Sultans of all states would not discriminate amongst their subjects, and would like ALL subjects to be sing to their respective state anthems with pride and love. Hmmm.. now perhaps, they can't and shouldn't, especially if they are Catholics.

Too strict an interpretation of what Johari Ibrahim says, you say?

Well, whilst I understand the concerns amongts Muslims, one thing that Muslims in Malaysia too, need to be aware of is that beyond Malaysia, say just across the waters in Indonesia, and further, Allah is used as a reference of and the name of God.

Islam is not about suppression. Islamic scholars actually invite everyone to have intelligent discussions and debates, to argue each other's cases. You cannot debate on Islam intelligently if you are not well-read. The first word in the Quran is after all, "Read".

The word ‘Allah’ can only be used in the context of Islam and not any other religion, said Deputy Internal Security Minister Johari Baharum, as reported in Malaysiakini.

If the word "Allah" is only for the Muslims, then how would non-Muslims wanting to learn the religion do so - can't they write, say or mention the word "Allah" in their quests, writings and queries?

Johari, all you need to do is ask the Herald to just print a disclaimer, to say that the Herald does not profess to write about Islam but instead, it is a circular on Christianity in its Malay section. Most of the Christian literature in the Malay language are brought in from Indonesia, which also refer to God as Allah, or Tuhan Yesus.

What do you want to do? Not let them write in Malay? To not let them print in the Malay language is then saying that "The Malay language is only for the Muslims." You better make sure you retain some sense, else the whole of Malaysian schools will be headed for trouble!

If you really speak on Islam, you would want to think that Allah is for all. He is the Most Merciful, Most Loving, Most Forgiving. Islam means submission to Allah, the one God. Allah never made Himself exclusive, yet Johari is.

Islam is in its simplest sense and meaning, submission to Allah swt, the one God. The people of the Book refer to Allah as God. So some religions reject Islam, but as they follow their versions of religion which perhaps are based on the Books, hence referring to their God as Allah, like the Arab Christians do. What do you want to do about them, Johari?

Well, if Johari wants to make Islam so narrow, then this is how narrow things can get. Go to the Arab nations, go after the Arab Christians who use and refer to God as "Allah". Johari, all you need to do, is Iqra'. Read, and sir, "read" does not simply mean read and let lost, it means you also need to understand, and use your brains.

Many people make reference to "Allah". What do you say to the Sikhs? Not let them use "allah" too? Even the late Lim Goh Tong once said during the Genting landslide, when asked about the cause, "Ini Tuhan Allah punya kuasa". Go take out the tv footage when he was interviewed at the mishap location. I recall that bit clearly! Now, I'm pretty sure he wasn't a Muslim!

(wikipedia :
Arabic-speakers of all Abrahamic faiths, including Christians and Jews, use the word "Allah" to mean "God". The Christian Arabs of today have no other word for 'God' than 'Allah'. Arab Christians for example use terms Allāh al-ab (الله الآب) meaning God the father, Allāh al-ibn (الله الابن) mean God the son, and Allāh al-ruh al ghodus (الله الروح القدس) meaning God the Holy Spirit (See God in Christianity for the Christian concept of God).

If only Johari is better read, he would have found this out within seconds and not make such statements. Then again, if he didn't, we wouldn't have things to make fun of. And if he didn't, he wouldn't have gotten the support from the poor pakciks and makciks who are not educated enough to understand the underlying reason for his statement. Make use of Islam to gain political mileage, why don't you...

Tuesday, December 18, 2007

What Racial disputes spinning out of control?

The Singapore newspapers are truly counting on people to just quickly read the first few lines of their papers and then forming their opinions. Below, they have reported in such a way that it paints the image of various races of Malaysians rioting against each other!

Oi! We Malaysians are not out to kill each other. We are just miffed with our politicians and even so, the last thing any Malaysian wants to do is to engage in racial riots!

Hindraf is not aimed at causing or inciting hatred amongst Indians against the Malays. Far from it. Hindraf just wants the economic problems faced by the Indians to be taken care of.

People, whilst we can freely debate and argue our cases and views, we do have to be wary of what others, especially those with all interests to see Malaysia falls flat in its face are trying to do.

With reports like this, and mind you, their papers are always reporting things that way, you know how Temasek group and their friendlies will pounce on the Malaysian Bourse the moment our blue chip shares topple following unrests or adverse reporting on the economic and political situations. With our Ringgit only barely half of theirs, the great Malaysia sale to them is all year round!

They already own Southern Johore as far as they are concerned. They already have their hands on Telekom and TNB, as the current regime saw it fit to let them have. Being Singaporeans, they want more. And they will do all to get what they want.
They are twisting the causes fought by Malaysians, they want us all to hate each other. Don't let them. We fight our causes, by all means, but be wary of these "batu api".

Apart from that, guess what? They have made Singaporeans embrace the notion that the only reason that Malaysia's economy is going down the drain is because Tun Mahathir keeps condemning each move taken by the PM. Yeah, TDM, whose every word no newspaper is allowed to print, is the cause. Well, except for Malaysiakini which had the interview with the man not too long ago. So, Singaporeans say it is not because PM cannot do much or doesn't know what to do, instead, he just cannot do anything as he is being sabotaged by TDM. I told my Singapore counterparts to read Malaysiakini or Malaysia Today to find out how Malaysians feel. How many Malaysians don't share Singapore's love for our current premier.
Singapore wants Malaysia to continue to be headed by the current regime.They love being able to do what they like.

Can't say I blame them, actually. They get to reclaim areas so vast that Johore gets flooded every year since the last few years badly as the areas around the Causeway can no longer flow smoothly. Nobody is stoping them. In return, the Malaysian Government gets to tell Malayisans that they are going all out to defend Batu Putih. Singapore, in turn, and as usual gets more out of any deal, are getting more land in Johore. They will soon get to buy land, property, set up businesses and livelihood in Southern Johore freely without the need for passports, just easily gotten chipcards.

Maybe they had to pay for the same, maybe not. If they did, who pocketed the funds? But hey. Don't speculate. You're only going to spread rumours.

If you were Singapore, wouldn't you have loved it, too?

From the Straits Times
Dec 19, 2007
KL eyes mediators to soothe race woes
KUALA LUMPUR - MALAYSIA will set up panels of mediators across the country from early next year to try to calm racial disputes before they spin out of control, a newspaper reported on Wednesday.
After 50 years of independence, race relations remain a thorny issue in a country that has suffered race riots.

Last week, the government jailed without trial five ethnic Indian activists from a group that brought more than 10,000 protesters into the streets over claims of race discrimination.

The panels of 10 to 15 people, drawn from unity department staff trained in mediation and neighbourhood watch officials, will work with the police and tackle problems on the ground to defuse any racial tension, the New Straits Times said.

'The committees have been given the task of achieving a win-win situation for all the parties concerned,' Azman Amin Hassan, the chief of Malaysia's national unity and integration department, told the paper.

The groups will initially be set up in the Malaysian capital and the surrounding state of Selangor, the northern island of Penang and southern Johor on the border with Singapore, it said.

'We are told that these are the states which have the most racial problems,' Mr Azman said, quoting federal police data.

Once informed by police of a clash or argument that might take on racial overtones, panel members would swing into action and try to resolve matters, he added.

Eventually, the government planned to widen the district-level panels to include grassroots leaders, local authorities and members of the police as well, Mr Azman said. -- REUTERS

Wednesday, December 12, 2007

Stop The Talk and Show what You've got!

We have marched. We have protested. We have ordered teh tarek after teh tarek, banged on tables, venting our frustrations and anger.

We have screamed "The system is corrupted. The judiciary is twisted. The economy is dwindling, prices and inflation continuosly rising."

Yes, we have read or even written blogs, read Malaysiakini and Malaysia Today, published our comments on those sites, satisfied that our words now are read by the many. Many, many are with us, we say.

Who's us? Are we going to really matter? The reason why the regime is not bothered to listen is because they know they are not going to get your votes. But they also know, that many of those protesting are not even registered voters, so it's not like the opposition is going to get your votes!

End of the day, no matter how fiery your speeches are, how many kilometres you have plodded through in your marches, you do have to realise that all that amounts to nothing come the elections.

So, are you then, a registered voter? Have you voted before and will you? If you are unable to answer "yes" to those questions, then, you might as well go home, pick up a copy of a magazine or tabloid, or flick those channels on Astro. Because raving and ranting on and on, marching on and on, isn't going to get you anywhere at the end of the day. You might as well cuddle up in the comforts of your home, because essentially, despite all the talk, you've done nothing and are not capable of doing anything.

Help keep that democracy. Help to truly make that change. Otherwise, someone is going to continue with the chest thumping, "I have the greatest landslide victory in history" and what can you say to that?? So you're not a voter, thus you didn't vote him. Well, you didn't help reduce that majority, did you? You let that chest-thumping happen.

At the end of the day, the votes count. You respect and uphold democracy? You make your voice heard. Even if you say the elections are rigged, at the every least, do your part and vote. There is no way they can rig an election too far, not a main one. If you are not a registered voter and cannot vote, save your breath. There is not much that you can do except be noisy. So don't blame the regime if again they win, and again with another landslide, because the people of Malaysia have decided that they should win.

There is yet this untested avenue to show our sentiments. We've marched, we've shouted. Now, get our votes counted.

Friday, December 7, 2007

Seek Comfort, People, as EC is impartial

Yes, in one breath he says that the EC is impartial, and within that same breath... our dear EC chairperson, Rashid, says, that in essence, the current government is the only one that is capable of running the country.If he believes that, (if?? laughs cue, everyone!) then we must believe that despite that belief, he will remain impartial, like how the judiciary is.

He went on to say, “(The independence of the EC) should be seen, not by some disgruntled politicians, but through the eyes of the whole rakyat. If the rakyat says, ‘I think Election Commission is independent’, that is enough,” said Abdul Rashid.

Yes. But of course. And on behalf of Malaysians, I pledge, and say, that we, Rakyats of Malaysia, do solemnly believe, and say, that "The Election Commission is independent".

We, the Rakyat, further aver that, we believe that pigs can fly..

relevant excerpts from Malaysiakini.

Rashid: No other regime capable of running the country
Fauwaz Abdul Aziz | Dec 8, 07 2:29pm

Election Commission (EC) chairperson Abdul Rashid Abdul Rahman let slip today his views on which ‘regime’ he regards as being capable of running the country, and said those who disagree with him do not realise the ‘critical’ situation the country is in.

“A lot of people are anxious to determine the type of regime that is going to handle Malaysia in the coming years. They are always talking about regimes. I never talk about regimes. There is only one regime in this country that is capable of running (it),” he said.

“People get angry with me whenever I say this (but) people don’t seem to understand the critical scenario in the country. What is it that can (take) over from the present one given the political scenario we are in?” he asked.

Wednesday, December 5, 2007

Not Just eye-brows raised here!

Eyebrows raised, hearts crestfallen - How I wish I never knew or heard of the notion of separation of powers. It may be easier for me to digest things, to live life in ignorance, in bliss. Maybe the majority of Malaysians can never, ever be fair and impartial after so long believing in one cause. To just the next day drop everything you've ever stood for and fought for politically for years and years. To not think of such affiliation when faced with deciding for or against any matter before you. But we must believe, that some people, or one or two persons, can..

As such, just because you and I can't fathom the idea, doesn't mean other super beings can't. So it is the minority few who can do so that we should give credit to. Some people are marvels, so I guess we should instead of raising our eye-brows, marvel at their abilities.. or like the Bar, congratulate these people.

Maybe many more members of the Bar would be elevated dato'ships.. who knows..

chosen excerpts from Malaysiakini :
Abdul Hamid is new CJ, Zaki is judiciary's No 2

Court of Appeal president Abdul Hamid Mohamad has been today appointed as the new chief justice, which is the judiciary's most powerful post.

Meanwhile Zaki Azmi - who has parachuted into the Federal Court three months ago - has been appointed Court of Appeal president, taking over Abdul Hamid’s former post.

The unconventional elevation of Zaki, 62, could pose another blow to the ailing reputation of the judiciary. Exactly three months ago, he became the first lawyer to be directly appointed into the Federal Court.
Zaki's lightning-fast promotion to the judiciary's No 2 post is unprecedented and is expected to raise eyebrows.

Zaki previously served as Umno’s legal adviser and disciplinary committee chairperson. He was also the party’s selection committee secretary and deputy chairperson of the disciplinary board appeal panel.

While congratulating both Abdul Hamid and Zaki on their appointment, Ambiga also said that the Bar was looking forward to a new era of co-operation with the judiciary.

It will be quite an era....

Tuesday, December 4, 2007

So, Who's Emotional?

NST online 2007/11/30

Hishammuddin: No need to get emotional over Hindraf

PUTRAJAYA: Malays have been advised not to get emotional over the accusations made by the Hindu Rights Action Force (Hindraf). Err.. who's emotional? UMNO only mah! up to Hindraf la to raise their cause.

"It did not represent the views of all Indians in Malaysia. In this matter, our enemy is not the Indian community. Hindraf doesn't represent all Indians, so be rational. ohhh.. you are so rational...

He added that whatever grievances the Indian community had, they were not the only ones sounding out a "cry of desperation".

"We hear this cry from all races too. Our policies address all races and such issues have been and will continue to be addressed. But we can't satisfy everyone overnight." And despite that acknowledgement, despite knowing, you do nothing....

Umno Youth deputy chief Khairy Jamaluddin said the party should take legal action against members of Hindraf for alleging that Umno was responsible for the killing of Malaysian citizens during the Kampung Medan incident. Shut up la

"We have to set the record straight, otherwise many people will have negative perceptions of Umno," he said. What do you know about straight records?

Khairy hoped Umno members - particularly Youth members would react in a mature way to the provocation. Yeah, emulate you, o mature one..

"I deny the allegation that Indians are treated like slaves in Malaysia. The Barisan Nasional government is for everyone," he said. read : everyone who's in their party

Khairy added that certain quarters wanted to show that the people are upset with the government since elections would be held soon. Well, they are!

He also reiterated that Hindraf members did not represent the majority of Indians in Malaysia as those who participated in the illegal rally numbered a few thousand compared with the millions in the country," he said. Like UMNO youth?

"I am sure that the majority of Indians support the government and Umno." I bet you're so so right...

Authorities Have Acted Honestly!

I won't comment further on the Bar and its march, I've written earlier on this, but as far as the statements by the Bar Councl (marked bold in the article extracted from Malaysiakini below) are concerned, well, the authorities have acted honestly here! Truly!

The Bar Council had hoped that the march would have "demonstrated ...that the people can walk peacefully in unity for human rights...[that] It would have been an opportunity for the authorities to show to the world that we subscribe to these values.."

Well, if the Government condoned to the people walking peacefully in unite, or they indeed subcsribed to the notion of such values, they would have allowed the march. But surprise! surprise! they just simply don't. Plus, if they allowed that march, that means they have been unfair to Bersih and Hindraf. So, they are being fair to all. See?

Thus, the authorities are justified in their stand, i.e. in not allowing the people or the world, for the matter, to think that such rights exist. To allow the walk go on, would have implied that they indeed, uphold such rights. How could they? That would have been hypocritical of them!

So this time, you have to agree, they rightly stood their ground...

(Extracts from article in Malaysiakini)
For full story - http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/75641

Bar calls off Sunday march
Beh Lih Yi
Dec 4, 07 4:23pm


The Bar Council has called off its annual human rights day march on Sunday, ostensibly due to pressure from the authorities to obtain a police permit and it being branded as an ‘anti-government’ rally.

Ambiga said the lawyers’ march should not have become a controversial issue in the first place.

“Most significantly, it should not be vilified as affecting race relations or be regarded as an anti-government rally,” she added.

According to her, the event would have demonstrated racial harmony and that the people can walk peacefully in unity for human rights.

“It would have been an opportunity for the authorities to show to the world that we subscribe to these values. It is a missed opportunity,” she said.
...

Sunday, December 2, 2007

And the Pun Continues!

We'll never hear the end of this! This is akin with the initial brilliant idea later scrapped - ie whether Sheikh Muzaffar could have made teh tarek in space....

As stated in the previous Halal Car, the Best yet from Proton post

Malaysia firm's 'Muslim car' plan
By Robin Brant
BBC News, Kuala Lumpur


Proton believes it may have found a huge gap in the market
The Malaysian carmaker Proton has announced plans to develop an "Islamic car", designed for Muslim motorists.
Proton is planning on teaming up with manufacturers in Iran and Turkey to create the unique vehicle.

The car could boast special features like a compass pointing to Mecca and a dedicated space to keep a copy of the Koran and a headscarf.

Stand your ground, Bar Council

Whatever your ground is. Or is it, march your ground?

It would seem that "Marching" is the in-theme of the Bar Council. 1st, The March to send a memorandum to the Prime Minister, when the Prime Minister was not even in the country, (you could have checked with his office earlier), now this.

So.. "this is not a protest march", as you put it, but it is a march, nonetheless!

Surely lawyers have better means to show their causes than just conducting marches every time a topic or issue comes up. If the International Human Rights Day is the excuse, have a charity run for it then, that would have lasted longer, with more participation. Surely permits for charity runs wold be easier obtained, it being non-political and all. And the message if printed on t-shirts of participants for the run would be more prominent than what, another series of lawyers in their suits marching?

Out of curiosity, the law is to be upheld, (well, at least lawyers argue in the name of the law), are you now saying the Bar Council will no longer have creed for the law?

The people are counting on you lawyers. Please, lead the people with the intelligence and decorum that lawyers used to possess. Leave the marches to Bersih or other organisations. You.. prepare the arguments, recommendations, studies, whatever, that befits your profession. Think about it, seriously. We expect the Bar to fight with brains, not engage only in public displays.

Until the, the people impatiently await.

see quote excerpt below :
[ambiga] "We would decide whether or not to proceed without a police permit once the police get back to us."

courtesy : Malaysiakini
Bar: Dec 9 event not a protest march
Yoges Palaniappan
Dec 1, 07 6:23pm


Bar Council chairperson Ambiga Sreenevasan has explained that the march on Dec 9 is not an anti-government rally but the Bar's annual event in marking the International Human Rights Day.

"The whole event is a celebration. It is the celebration of the International Humans Rights Day which falls on Dec 10," she said.

Ambiga said that the march would be peaceful in a manner causing "as little disruption to the public as possible."

She said the march is only one part of the three-hour program themed "Freedom of Expression though Art, Music, Culture and Conscience".

"It would only take 15 minutes out of the whole programme which is meant to encompass a whole range of activities which is attractive to a whole range of people," she said, adding that the two-year old program aims to raise public awareness about human rights.

Commenting on whether the Bar has obtained a police permit for the march, Ambiga said: "In our discussion with the police yesterday morning, we talked on ways to go ahead with the event with minimum disruptions."

She said she hopes to hear from the police on Monday as to whether a police permit will be given for the march.

"We want the cooperation of the police because it is good for the nation to celebrate the event in a united manner without caring which parties are coming for it. We want them to come as Malaysians," she said.

"We would decide whether or not to proceed without a police permit once the police get back to us."

'No news from Bersih'

Ambiga also denied knowledge that Coalition for Free and Clean Elections (Bersih) has voiced its intention to join the march.

Asked if Bersih has informed the Bar of its intention to participate in the march, Ambiga said: "That's what we read. But Bersih hasn't communicated to us its intention directly."

Ambiga also did not deny the possibility of Bersih or any other NGOs joining in the march.

She said the event is open for public participation; therefore it would not stop anyone from joining the Bar in its march.

"We have invited a whole range of people including NGOs, civil society groups, political parties from all sides of divide and also foreign embassies. We hope that this will be one event where everybody will drop their differences and join us to celebrate human rights," she said.

However, she said the bar is not interested in people going for the event and disrupt it. Therefore, she said he Bar is making its own arrangement of tight control to avoid disruption.

"We will ensure on our accord that no disruption is caused to our agenda, which is to celebrate human rights. We assure that we would not allow any party to hijack our event."

Till the Next Better Partner Comes Along

This is disturbing, never mind that it is happening in China, soon enough it will infiltrate this region. More and more couples stop at one or two kids,wanting to make sure they can give the best (read : the most expensive, branded clothes, toys, fancy pre-school) to their kids.

China's "me" generation
19:04 ET, Tue 27 Nov 2007

By Chen Aizhu

BEIJING (Reuters) - Ten months after they tied the knot, Li Lei and Wang Yang, both 20-something Chinese professionals, decided it was time to break up so they could spend more time with their lovers.

They signed on the dotted line on their divorce paper less than 20 minutes after answering "no" to a few key questions -- "Do you have kids?" and "Any disputes on property?"

China's phenomenal economic growth has created a generation of "emperors" and "empresses", the now-adult children of China's one-child policy, who often put their needs before anything and anyone else.

Experts say many of this generation are unable to sustain relationships, a result of being spoiled only children, doted on by parents and grandparents who catered to their every whim.

"They are weak in horizontal bonding, communicating with the same generation," said Professor Fucius Yunlan, a U.S.-trained psychiatrist who runs counseling sessions in Beijing.

"They tend to apply a vertical approach to horizontal relationships."

With an enlarged sense of entitlement, some of these couples tend to part quickly. Counselors say some marriages fall apart after a week or a few months.

China launched the controversial one-child policy in the early 1980s to curb its population, now over 1.3 billion.

The restrictions, which vary from city to countryside, caused a variety of social problems such as a fast-aging society and a breakdown of family values which used to be based on the traditional Confucian ideal of a large and close family.

PROBLEMS OF THE RICH

The problem of grown only children having difficulties sustaining relationships is particularly pronounced among the affluent middle-and upper-classes who have accumulated enormous wealth from China's economic success.

Divorce figures in some cities show about one-third of all divorce cases involve children of the affluent "me" generation.

Brought up in China's economic and social turmoil of the 1950s and 1960s, many parents buried themselves in work to build a better life as the country underwent dizzying economic growth over the past two decades just as their kids reached their teens.

"They ignored the emotional education of their children," explained Prof. Fucius.

But in many cases, these parents showered their children with everything that money could buy as well as the emotional weight of high expectations for their only children.

Lu Qingyi, an economist and a day trader at the booming Chinese stock market, has set money aside to finance a car and a business for his 21-year-old son who is now thinking of aborting a finance degree in London to open a coffee shop in Beijing.

"Actually I've prepared a contingent fund for him in case he fails in the first business," Lu added. "But of course I keep it hush-hush".

SEXUAL MORES

Marriages among China's elite often seem to be more about amassing wealth than nurturing relationships, observers suggest. When a partner with better prospects comes along, some couples such as Li Lei and Wang Yang think nothing of breaking up.

It's a lifestyle that contrasts sharply to that of their parents who viewed marriage as a duty and divorce a shame.

"You will never ever find any trace in this generation of how we felt in the old days, guys didn't even dare touch a girl's fingers before marriage," said Gary Xu, 55, a Red Guard in Mao Zedong's chaotic Cultural Revolution who spent his teen years herding buffalo in the remote southwest.

In Xu's time, when youths studied Marxism and dreamed of becoming model workers, pre-marital sex could cost one a treasured job at a state-run factory or expulsion from a prestigious university.

Marriage was about a couple working together to earn a television set, a bicycle, or a fridge.

"Kids today start their relationship right from the bed," said Xu. "It's a completely new generation."

These days, cohabitation is commonplace and extra-marital sex is gaining acceptance. A new car, preferably a foreign brand, and a two-bedroom apartment, or at least a down payment on an apartment, is essential in a new marriage among the well-to-do.

Parents also feed the idea of marrying into "the right family" with a sound financial and political standing.

"If you marry into a rich and powerful family, you don't need to plan anything as everything will be set for you smoothly and perfectly," said a secretary, who asked not to be named.

"It will be a comfortable life. Why should we endure a hard life?"

The tens of millions of poor people in China's impoverished rural areas are too preoccupied with trying to eke out a living on incomes as low as $80 per year to mimic the mores of the affluent.

But in the big cities, experts are seeing a sharp shift in social values among 20-somethings from the wealthy elite and fast-expanding middle class.

"This generation faces a completely different set of reality versus their parents," explained Professor Fucius. "They are very much self-oriented, not others-oriented or social-oriented."

"Their parents listen to what the superiors, tradition and other people have to say. They listen to themselves."


© Reuters 2007. All rights reserved.

Singapore Elders at It Again

Dec 2, 2007 Straits Times
No end yet to Hainan clan dispute

BARELY a month after they promised to make peace brokered by prominent elders, two squabbling factions of the Hainan clan here are at it again.

The usually quiet Kheng Chiu Building in Beach Road burst into life on Saturday when the two groups verbally jousted at the election of officials for the Kheng Chiu Tin Hou Kong Burial Ground, the financial arm of the Hainan Hwee Kuan here.

About 230 people, mainly men in their 50s and 60s, packed the meeting in the ground-floor hall.

In one corner were the incumbent office holders, led by Mr Wong Yeh Yuh, 72, chairman of the Tin Hou Kong council.

In the the other was challenger Foo Joo Peng, 55, president of the Hainan Hwee Kuan, which has a separate governing committee.

Mr Wong is an old-timer who has been in the council for about 20 years while Mr Foo represents the younger, reform-minded faction.

At stake was control over a company which has almost $40 million in assets, mainly three properties.

Controversy erupted when Mr Wong and his allies decided to call off the elections on the grounds that the meeting was turning unruly.

Mr Lee Ah Fong, who is in Mr Wong's camp, said that the meeting was called off as there were attempts to grab the microphone, with the situation teetering out of control.

Read the full report in Monday's edition of The Straits Times.

Halal Car, the best yet from Proton

Wonder why this piece didn't make it big in Malaysiakini.com or Malaysia Today!

Hey.. doesn't the Quran come in various sizes? Which size would they decide on? Discrimination it is, if smoe sizes are omitted. And would the compartment for scarfs be a hanging closet or drawer?

Is Proton going to have a fancy R&D grant to look into this "design upgrades?"

Really! No wonder Volkswagen took off! Proton, just install mini-fridges in your cars... those that would keep small mineral water bottles. That will sell better!

Malaysia, Iran, Turkey plan "Islamic" car - report
Sun Nov 11, 2007 8:12am EST

KUALA LUMPUR, Nov 11 (Reuters) - Malaysia plans to team up with Iran and Turkey to jointly develop what they called the world's first "Islamic" car, complete with features for Muslims, for the world market, Malaysia's Bernama news agency said. The car will incorporate features such as a compass to determine the direction of Mecca for prayers as well as compartments for storing the Koran and headscarves, it quoted the head of Malaysian carmaker Proton Holdings (PROT.KL: Quote, Profile, Research) as saying.

"We will identify a car that we can develop and produce it in Malaysia, Iran or Turkey," Proton Chief Executive Syed Zainal Abidin Syed Mohamed Tahir, on a visit to Iran, said.

"For Proton, we are more than happy because we have products that we can share," he said, adding that the move could help Proton cut down development costs, increase production volume and improve its economies of scale.

In August the state-controlled company reported its fifth straight quarterly loss, as sales continued to slide and its search for a global industry partner dragged on without success.

The Malaysian government has indicated it is willing to sell a stake in Proton to a global car maker and has been in separate talks with Volkswagen (VOWG.DE: Quote, Profile, Research) and General Motors (GM.N: Quote, Profile, Research), but so far no agreement has been reached.

(Reporting by Jalil Hamid; Editing by Greg Mahlich)

((jalil.hamid@reuters.com; 603-2333 8047; Reuters Messaging jalil.hamid.reuters.com@reuters.net)) Keywords: PROTON/ISLAM

(C) Reuters 2007. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution ofReuters content, including by caching, framing or similar means, is expresslyprohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters and the Reuterssphere logo are registered trademarks and trademarks of the Reuters group ofcompanies around the world.nSP133870

© Reuters2007All rights reserved

http://www.reuters.com/article/basicindustries-SP-A/idUSSP13387020071111